Jeremy Clarkson Weighs Quitting the UK – What Happens Next to Clarkson’s Farm?
Jeremy Clarkson Contemplates Leaving UK Over Political and Economic Frustrations
Jeremy Clarkson, the outspoken former host of Top Gear and The Grand Tour, has voiced deep concerns about the state of the United Kingdom, describing it as a nation hurtling toward a “broken future” marked by excessive taxation, rising crime, and rampant disease. In his latest column for The Sunday Times, the 65-year-old television personality and farmer expressed frustration with what he perceives as a deteriorating national landscape under Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government, prompting him to consider relocating abroad. However, despite exploring options like Dubai, Australia, and New Zealand, Clarkson ultimately argued for staying in the UK, citing the comfort of familiar surroundings and the hope that political challenges will eventually pass.
A Grim Outlook on Britain’s Future
In his column, Clarkson painted a bleak picture of the UK, lamenting a “flatlining” economy, a stagnant housing market, and an “ineffective” police force. He described the country as an “unsalvageable basket case” that has “slipped into a pair of Fairy Liquid butter trousers and is currently hurtling down the slide of doom into a broken future full of nothing but taxation, crime, and disease.” These strong words reflect Clarkson’s growing disillusionment with the state of the nation, which he attributes to systemic issues exacerbated by the current government’s policies.
Clarkson’s criticisms are not new. He has been vocal about his disdain for Starmer, whom he has previously banned from his Cotswolds pub, The Farmer’s Dog, accusing the Prime Minister of being dismissive toward farmers. In August 2025, Clarkson told Times Radio, “I hate very few people in life, but I do hate that man. He’s awful. He’s definitely banned. He’s just so flippant about farmers.” His latest remarks amplify these sentiments, tying his personal grievances to broader concerns about the UK’s trajectory under Labour’s leadership.

Challenges at Diddly Squat Farm
Clarkson’s frustrations are compounded by a particularly difficult year at his 1,000-acre Diddly Squat Farm in Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire, which he has branded the “worst year ever” for his agricultural venture. The farm, featured in the popular Amazon Prime series Clarkson’s Farm, has faced relentless heatwaves and drought in 2025, severely impacting crop yields. More recently, a bovine tuberculosis (TB) outbreak among his cattle forced the farm into a two-month lockdown, prohibiting the buying or selling of cows. This devastating setback, which Clarkson described as “absolutely dreadful,” has added to his sense of despair.
Speaking to Times Radio in July 2025, Clarkson shared the emotional toll of the TB outbreak, which was discovered in a pregnant cow carrying twins. “It’s awful, it is awful. You have a test every six months on the cows, and then you sort of become blasé, it’s a hypothetical threat,” he said. “And then the vet looks up, as he did yesterday lunchtime, and said, ‘I’m really sorry, this one’s failed.’” The infected cow, along with others testing positive, must be culled under government regulations, a legal requirement that Clarkson noted with resignation on social media: “They have to be culled. It’s the law.” Despite the lockdown, Clarkson clarified that his Diddly Squat Farm Shop remains unaffected and continues to operate normally.
The TB outbreak is just one of many challenges Clarkson has faced at Diddly Squat. From adverse weather to planning disputes with local authorities, his journey as a farmer has been fraught with obstacles, many of which have been documented in Clarkson’s Farm. These struggles have not only tested his resilience but also fueled his broader critique of government policies, particularly those affecting rural communities.

Contemplating Emigration
Amid these personal and national challenges, Clarkson explored the idea of leaving the UK for greener pastures. He identified Australia, New Zealand, and the United States as “obvious choices” for relocation, particularly for those with a “Trump disposition.” However, he dismissed these options due to the “tiresome” bureaucratic hurdles involved, such as complex forms and immigration requirements. European countries like Italy, France, Spain, Croatia, Portugal, and Switzerland were also ruled out, though Clarkson did not elaborate on specific reasons for their exclusion.
Ultimately, Clarkson turned his attention to Dubai, which he described as an appealing destination due to its lack of income tax, affordable petrol at 50p per litre, effective policing, and sunny climate. Reflecting on his visits to Dubai in the early 1990s, when it was less developed, Clarkson noted that the city now feels like “the bastard love child of Las Vegas and Mickey Mouse.” Despite its attractions, he expressed reservations about its modern character, suggesting it lacks the charm it once had.
A Case for Staying
Despite his flirtation with the idea of emigration, Clarkson concluded that staying in the UK is the better option. He argued that relocating abroad carries uncertainties about future conditions in other countries. “If you move abroad, in three-and-a-half years you will be living in another country, and God knows what it will be like there then,” he wrote. In contrast, remaining in the UK offers the comfort of being surrounded by friends and family, with the added hope that “the horror of [Keir] Starmer will have gone” by the next election cycle. This optimistic outlook reflects Clarkson’s belief that political challenges are temporary and that enduring them in familiar surroundings is preferable to starting anew elsewhere.
Clarkson’s decision to stay was further reinforced by his response to media reports that exaggerated his comments about leaving the UK. Taking to Instagram, he fiercely denied claims that he was seriously planning to relocate, calling such reports “utter horses***” and “b*****ks.” He accused media outlets of misrepresenting his musings for clickbait, emphasizing that he has no intention of abandoning Diddly Squat Farm or the UK.

A Broader Critique of Governance
Clarkson’s column also touched on his ongoing criticism of Labour’s policies, particularly those affecting farmers. He has previously accused the government of “ethnically cleansing” the countryside through measures like inheritance tax hikes, which he claims threaten the viability of family farms. In November 2024, he joined thousands of farmers in London to protest these tax changes, arguing that they could force farmers to sell land to cover tax bills, potentially paving the way for development projects like “immigrant towns” or wind farms. His outspoken stance has made him a prominent voice for the farming community, amplified by the success of Clarkson’s Farm.
While Clarkson’s rhetoric is often hyperbolic, it resonates with many who share his frustrations over rising costs, regulatory burdens, and perceived neglect of rural issues. His comments about Starmer reflect a broader sentiment among some farmers who feel marginalized by government policies, particularly on issues like bovine TB and inheritance tax.
The Path Forward
Despite the challenges, Clarkson remains committed to Diddly Squat Farm, where he continues to navigate the complexities of modern agriculture. The bovine TB outbreak, while devastating, has not shuttered his farm shop, and his determination to keep it operational underscores his resilience. Meanwhile, Clarkson’s Farm has had a positive impact beyond his personal struggles, inspiring a surge in applications to agricultural colleges, with institutions like the Royal Agricultural University and Harper Adams University reporting significant increases in interest, particularly in land management courses. This “Clarkson effect” highlights the show’s role in reshaping perceptions of farming as a viable and dynamic career.
As Clarkson weighs his frustrations with the UK against his deep ties to his farm and community, his decision to stay reflects a pragmatic hope that better days lie ahead. Whether his criticisms of the government will spur meaningful change remains to be seen, but for now, Clarkson’s voice continues to resonate, both as a farmer and a cultural commentator.




